It had been a long day. My mind was full of worries about my job at the athletic club, college, my trigonometry grade, piano and the impending SAT. I sat wearily down on the couch in the living room and reluctantly picked up Herodotus – opening it up, the first sentence my tired eyes fell upon was, “Croesus, son of Alyattes, by birth a Lydian, was lord of all the nations to the west of the river Halys. This stream, which separates Syria 
            “The first man to distill bourbon whiskey in the United States 
            Historians and teachers clamor, “History perfects the present! We learn how to mend our mistakes of the past by studying it!” But this doesn’t seem to hold true – if it did, by now we should have accumulated enough information about our ancestors’ mistakes to be rid of war, poverty and corruption. Moreover, how will knowing that Napoleon’s attempt to invade Russia Rome  and the Romantic civilizations of nineteenth century England 
            Proponents of history also claim it foretells the future – whether it is the outcome of a battle, an everyday decision, or a political choice. In other words, we learn from the past how to better the future. Yet the same argument against the past stands – history cannot “tell” the future. It is not a crystal ball which we can look into and see consequences of causes. “History repeats itself” may be a maxim that is generally true, because human nature has not changed significantly, but it does not aid mankind in his daily decisions. This is because times and seasons do change and men have adapted to them. 
            Lastly, the study of history is not important – the study of the present is. Stories of the past may be entertaining enough, and perhaps if you know them, you can show off how educated you are by writing a book. But it is the now that the majority of us are worried about – and it is the us who matter, not the Napoleons, Alexanders, or Romanovs of days gone by. 
 
 
1 comment:
I like how you begin, Anna. You start out by capturing the reader's attention with a short "story" -if you will.
And I also think that your argument is convincing-more so if someone hates to study History, but of course, I still am for studying History, even not being a big fan of the subject.
Post a Comment